<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47814</link>
    <description>Erroneous Modvat credit was reversed within about a month, and the authorities found no fraud, collusion, misrepresentation, or misdeclaration. On that factual basis, the appellate authority declined to levy penalty or recover interest, and the Tribunal did not disturb that finding. The document states that in the absence of any culpable conduct and with prompt reversal of credit, penalty and interest were not exigible, and no interference was called for.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:49:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47814</link>
      <description>Erroneous Modvat credit was reversed within about a month, and the authorities found no fraud, collusion, misrepresentation, or misdeclaration. On that factual basis, the appellate authority declined to levy penalty or recover interest, and the Tribunal did not disturb that finding. The document states that in the absence of any culpable conduct and with prompt reversal of credit, penalty and interest were not exigible, and no interference was called for.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>