<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 172 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47807</link>
    <description>The Court quashed and set aside the order dated 30th June, 2005, which dismissed three revision applications under Section 35EE(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found that the non-consideration of the Corrigendum dated 29th November, 2002 clarifying Notification No. 43/2002-Cus was crucial and required reconsideration by the revisional authority. The three revision applications were restored for fresh consideration in light of the corrigendum. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:35:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 172 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47807</link>
      <description>The Court quashed and set aside the order dated 30th June, 2005, which dismissed three revision applications under Section 35EE(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found that the non-consideration of the Corrigendum dated 29th November, 2002 clarifying Notification No. 43/2002-Cus was crucial and required reconsideration by the revisional authority. The three revision applications were restored for fresh consideration in light of the corrigendum. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>