https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93981 The NCLAT dismissed the appeals, upholding the adjudicating authority's rejection under s.114(1) of the I&B Code of the appellants' repayment plan(s) for personal guarantors. The Tribunal found no evidence of a group insolvency process, recorded an apparent failure by the appellants to furnish the modified repayment plan within prescribed timeframes after meetings on 29.11.2022 and 01.12.2022, and held that denial of revision under s.115 did not disclose any manifest error warranting interference. Subsequent initiation of proceedings under s.123 and the declaration of corporate guarantors' bankruptcy on 18.04.2024 further rendered the limited challenge to the repayment-plan rejection devoid of practical relief. en-us Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:03 +0530 Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93981 The NCLAT dismissed the appeals, upholding the adjudicating authority's rejection under s.114(1) of the I&B Code of the appellants' repayment plan(s) for personal guarantors. The Tribunal found no evidence of a group insolvency process, recorded an apparent failure by the appellants to furnish the modified repayment plan within prescribed timeframes after meetings on 29.11.2022 and 01.12.2022, and held that denial of revision under s.115 did not disclose any manifest error warranting interference. Subsequent initiation of proceedings under s.123 and the declaration of corporate guarantors' bankruptcy on 18.04.2024 further rendered the limited challenge to the repayment-plan rejection devoid of practical relief. Highlights IBC Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93981