https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780899 SC held that failure to furnish written grounds of arrest violated Article 22(1) and Section 50 CrPC (now Section 47 BNSS) and undermines procedural liberty. The Court mandated that grounds must be communicated in writing in a language the arrestee understands in every case; if impracticable at arrest (e.g., flagrante delicto), oral communication is permissible but a written copy must be supplied within a reasonable time and in any event at least two hours before production for remand. Remand papers must record grounds and any delay. Non-compliance renders arrest/remand illegal unless the written grounds are furnished as required. Appeal disposed. en-us Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780899 SC held that failure to furnish written grounds of arrest violated Article 22(1) and Section 50 CrPC (now Section 47 BNSS) and undermines procedural liberty. The Court mandated that grounds must be communicated in writing in a language the arrestee understands in every case; if impracticable at arrest (e.g., flagrante delicto), oral communication is permissible but a written copy must be supplied within a reasonable time and in any event at least two hours before production for remand. Remand papers must record grounds and any delay. Non-compliance renders arrest/remand illegal unless the written grounds are furnished as required. Appeal disposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780899