https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780910 Long-standing bail was not cancelled on the material then before the Court, despite allegations of evasion of service and repeated non-cooperation in the trial. The Court instead issued protective directions to secure the progress of the proceedings: the respondent was required to remain represented on every hearing date, and unjustified absence or non-representation could later justify cancellation of bail. The petitioner was left free to approach the trial court if non-cooperation continued, and the trial court was directed to proceed expeditiously. The result preserved bail for the time being while keeping cancellation open for future default. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780910 Long-standing bail was not cancelled on the material then before the Court, despite allegations of evasion of service and repeated non-cooperation in the trial. The Court instead issued protective directions to secure the progress of the proceedings: the respondent was required to remain represented on every hearing date, and unjustified absence or non-representation could later justify cancellation of bail. The petitioner was left free to approach the trial court if non-cooperation continued, and the trial court was directed to proceed expeditiously. The result preserved bail for the time being while keeping cancellation open for future default. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780910