https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780917 A delay of 512 days in filing an appeal was held not to be condonable because the appellant failed to show sufficient cause. The explanation that no notice or communication had been received was rejected after the record showed acknowledgment of the show cause notice by the karta of the HUF, including a request for time to reply. As the acknowledged address matched the address used in the proceedings and appeal, the appellant was found to have knowledge of the matter. The condonation application was therefore rejected. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Nov 2025 18:15:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780917 A delay of 512 days in filing an appeal was held not to be condonable because the appellant failed to show sufficient cause. The explanation that no notice or communication had been received was rejected after the record showed acknowledgment of the show cause notice by the karta of the HUF, including a request for time to reply. As the acknowledged address matched the address used in the proceedings and appeal, the appellant was found to have knowledge of the matter. The condonation application was therefore rejected. Case-Laws SEBI Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780917