https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780923 HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order that had rejected the petitioner's refund claim for double payment of duty. The court held the double deposit (Rs. 78,55,766) is not barred by limitation under section 27(1B) and must be refunded in view of Article 265 and applicable precedents. Respondents are directed to issue a refund order for Rs. 78,55,766 within eight weeks from receipt of the judgment. Petition allowed. en-us Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780923 HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order that had rejected the petitioner's refund claim for double payment of duty. The court held the double deposit (Rs. 78,55,766) is not barred by limitation under section 27(1B) and must be refunded in view of Article 265 and applicable precedents. Respondents are directed to issue a refund order for Rs. 78,55,766 within eight weeks from receipt of the judgment. Petition allowed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780923