<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 405 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780937</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) held that a trustee&#039;s deed provision permitting application of funds outside India cannot by itself justify denial of registration under section 12AB. The tribunal found that the possibility of expenditure abroad may affect exemption under section 11(1) but does not amount to contravention warranting refusal of registration. The matter was remitted to the CIT(E) to decide the final registration application on merits, applying this ratio.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 405 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780937</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) held that a trustee&#039;s deed provision permitting application of funds outside India cannot by itself justify denial of registration under section 12AB. The tribunal found that the possibility of expenditure abroad may affect exemption under section 11(1) but does not amount to contravention warranting refusal of registration. The matter was remitted to the CIT(E) to decide the final registration application on merits, applying this ratio.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>