https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780950 The HC held that the assessing officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings after implementation of the Faceless Scheme, following existing High Court precedents. Consequently, reassessment actions framed under sections 148A and 148 were quashed. The court found the batch of writ petitions covered by prior rulings and set aside the impugned proceedings for want of jurisdiction. en-us Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Nov 2025 14:05:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780950 The HC held that the assessing officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings after implementation of the Faceless Scheme, following existing High Court precedents. Consequently, reassessment actions framed under sections 148A and 148 were quashed. The court found the batch of writ petitions covered by prior rulings and set aside the impugned proceedings for want of jurisdiction. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780950