<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 423 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780955</link>
    <description>Validity of reopening of assessment under TOLA was treated as covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. The Revenue&#039;s Special Leave Petitions were disposed of on that basis, and the Assessing Officer was directed to dispose of the objections in accordance with the law laid down in that judgment. Assessees who remain aggrieved may pursue available remedies in law, except on issues already concluded by the earlier ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 423 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780955</link>
      <description>Validity of reopening of assessment under TOLA was treated as covered by the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. The Revenue&#039;s Special Leave Petitions were disposed of on that basis, and the Assessing Officer was directed to dispose of the objections in accordance with the law laid down in that judgment. Assessees who remain aggrieved may pursue available remedies in law, except on issues already concluded by the earlier ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>