https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47795 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay held that the writ petition challenging the order passed by the Central Government was maintainable as the revisional authority under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act acts as a Tribunal with judicial powers. The court rejected the preliminary objection raised regarding the maintainability of the petition and emphasized the judicial nature of the revisional authority's powers, making its orders subject to the writ jurisdiction of the Court. The court distinguished the cited cases from the present matter, concluding that their principles did not apply directly to the issues at hand. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:18:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47795 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay held that the writ petition challenging the order passed by the Central Government was maintainable as the revisional authority under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act acts as a Tribunal with judicial powers. The court rejected the preliminary objection raised regarding the maintainability of the petition and emphasized the judicial nature of the revisional authority's powers, making its orders subject to the writ jurisdiction of the Court. The court distinguished the cited cases from the present matter, concluding that their principles did not apply directly to the issues at hand. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47795