<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1573 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464634</link>
    <description>Non-disclosure of a past conviction in Form No. 2A could fall within the statutory concept of &quot;fake&quot; particulars under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, because the candidate was presented as having no conviction when one existed. However, the underlying conviction was for a protest-related regulatory offence under the Kerala Police Act, not a serious criminal offence, and the omission did not justify voiding the election on the facts. The same non-disclosure could not be treated as corrupt practice or undue influence, since the disclosure regime could not be stretched beyond the specific statutory grounds and no clear warrant existed to set aside the election.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 20:13:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1573 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464634</link>
      <description>Non-disclosure of a past conviction in Form No. 2A could fall within the statutory concept of &quot;fake&quot; particulars under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, because the candidate was presented as having no conviction when one existed. However, the underlying conviction was for a protest-related regulatory offence under the Kerala Police Act, not a serious criminal offence, and the omission did not justify voiding the election on the facts. The same non-disclosure could not be treated as corrupt practice or undue influence, since the disclosure regime could not be stretched beyond the specific statutory grounds and no clear warrant existed to set aside the election.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>