<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1659 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464642</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI held that disallowance under s.14A read with Rule 8D is unsustainable where the AO has not recorded the requisite satisfaction under s.14A regarding the assessee&#039;s accounts. Relying on the HC precedent, the Tribunal found that before applying Rule 8D the AO must conclude he is not satisfied with the assessee&#039;s suo moto computation; absence of such recorded satisfaction led to reversal of the AO&#039;s disallowance and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 20:13:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1659 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464642</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI held that disallowance under s.14A read with Rule 8D is unsustainable where the AO has not recorded the requisite satisfaction under s.14A regarding the assessee&#039;s accounts. Relying on the HC precedent, the Tribunal found that before applying Rule 8D the AO must conclude he is not satisfied with the assessee&#039;s suo moto computation; absence of such recorded satisfaction led to reversal of the AO&#039;s disallowance and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>