<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1921 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464649</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the requirement to file audit report in Form 10B is directory, not mandatory, and exemption under s.11 cannot be denied solely for delayed filing. Because the assessee&#039;s Form 10B was prepared before return filing and ultimately uploaded before issuance of the s.143(1) intimation, and the delay was caused by software glitches amounting to sufficient cause, the Tribunal condoned the delay and allowed the claim of exemption under s.11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 15:14:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1921 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464649</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the requirement to file audit report in Form 10B is directory, not mandatory, and exemption under s.11 cannot be denied solely for delayed filing. Because the assessee&#039;s Form 10B was prepared before return filing and ultimately uploaded before issuance of the s.143(1) intimation, and the delay was caused by software glitches amounting to sufficient cause, the Tribunal condoned the delay and allowed the claim of exemption under s.11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>