<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 189 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47791</link>
    <description>The HC of Gujarat quashed the communications by the Commissioner of Central Excise, directing a fresh hearing on the restoration application. The court held that the appeal should be restored despite pre-deposit non-compliance, emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities. Costs of Rs. 2,500 were imposed on the petitioner for not updating their address.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 189 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47791</link>
      <description>The HC of Gujarat quashed the communications by the Commissioner of Central Excise, directing a fresh hearing on the restoration application. The court held that the appeal should be restored despite pre-deposit non-compliance, emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities. Costs of Rs. 2,500 were imposed on the petitioner for not updating their address.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>