<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 167 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47790</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal did not have jurisdiction over the areas specified in Notification No. 251-Cus. The adjudication proceedings were deemed invalid, and the Tribunal&#039;s order to set aside the penalties and confiscation was justified. The respondents prevailed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 167 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47790</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal did not have jurisdiction over the areas specified in Notification No. 251-Cus. The adjudication proceedings were deemed invalid, and the Tribunal&#039;s order to set aside the penalties and confiscation was justified. The respondents prevailed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>