<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 151 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47788</link>
    <description>Imported vanaspati found adulterated on reliable laboratory evidence was treated as unfit for human consumption, and confiscation was sustained because food adulteration was viewed as a public health and social defence measure. A belated request for another re-test was rejected where the remnant sample had already been re-analysed and no compelling basis existed for a further fresh sample direction. Alternative prayers to make the goods fit for human consumption or to divert them to industrial use were also declined as late-stage pleas not raised before the lower authorities, and because industrial use would not adequately prevent misuse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:47:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 151 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47788</link>
      <description>Imported vanaspati found adulterated on reliable laboratory evidence was treated as unfit for human consumption, and confiscation was sustained because food adulteration was viewed as a public health and social defence measure. A belated request for another re-test was rejected where the remnant sample had already been re-analysed and no compelling basis existed for a further fresh sample direction. Alternative prayers to make the goods fit for human consumption or to divert them to industrial use were also declined as late-stage pleas not raised before the lower authorities, and because industrial use would not adequately prevent misuse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>