<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 188 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47780</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the writ petition, quashing the previous orders and remitting the matter to the Commission for a fresh hearing. The Court emphasized the necessity of a full and fair hearing post-clarifications and the Commission&#039;s obligation to reconsider the case in light of the revised value presented by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 188 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47780</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the writ petition, quashing the previous orders and remitting the matter to the Commission for a fresh hearing. The Court emphasized the necessity of a full and fair hearing post-clarifications and the Commission&#039;s obligation to reconsider the case in light of the revised value presented by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>