https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47777 The HC dismissed the writ appeal, affirming that an appeal to CESTAT under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, is permissible only against a final order, not a recommendation by the Designated Authority. The Central Government, under Section 9A, holds the discretion to impose Anti-Dumping Duty, independent of the Designated Authority's recommendation. The HC allowed the appellant to submit a representation to the Central Government, which must decide within two months. The Central Government is not bound by the Designated Authority's report and may reach a different conclusion, ensuring parties have the right to be heard. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47777 The HC dismissed the writ appeal, affirming that an appeal to CESTAT under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, is permissible only against a final order, not a recommendation by the Designated Authority. The Central Government, under Section 9A, holds the discretion to impose Anti-Dumping Duty, independent of the Designated Authority's recommendation. The HC allowed the appellant to submit a representation to the Central Government, which must decide within two months. The Central Government is not bound by the Designated Authority's report and may reach a different conclusion, ensuring parties have the right to be heard. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47777