https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47775 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an importer of coated and uncoated paper, allowing the release of goods subject to conditions. The petitioner was directed to deposit customs duty, 20% of the differential duty, furnish a bank guarantee for 75% of the remaining balance, provide a bond for the rest of the differential value, redemption fine, and penalty. The petitioner also had to file an affidavit not challenging the goods' identity during adjudication or prosecution. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and each party was to bear its own costs. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:33:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47775 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an importer of coated and uncoated paper, allowing the release of goods subject to conditions. The petitioner was directed to deposit customs duty, 20% of the differential duty, furnish a bank guarantee for 75% of the remaining balance, provide a bond for the rest of the differential value, redemption fine, and penalty. The petitioner also had to file an affidavit not challenging the goods' identity during adjudication or prosecution. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and each party was to bear its own costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47775