<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Writ petition challenging adjudicatory proceedings and alleged natural justice violation dismissed for repeated nonattendance and justified delay</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93945</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioners challenging adjudicatory proceedings and alleged violation of natural justice. The court found petitioners were served with show-cause notices, repeatedly responded, and repeatedly failed to attend rescheduled personal hearings; re-assignment to the incumbent commissioner who originally issued notices was held regular and was not challenged in time. Alleged incompetence of the Adjudicating/Proper Officer was rejected as an afterthought. Although the final order was communicated beyond the one-month guidance in the CBEC circular, paragraph 14.10 permits exceptional delay with file recording; respondents did not produce the file but the HC found explanations for delay in the order, and dismissed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:37:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Writ petition challenging adjudicatory proceedings and alleged natural justice violation dismissed for repeated nonattendance and justified delay</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93945</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioners challenging adjudicatory proceedings and alleged violation of natural justice. The court found petitioners were served with show-cause notices, repeatedly responded, and repeatedly failed to attend rescheduled personal hearings; re-assignment to the incumbent commissioner who originally issued notices was held regular and was not challenged in time. Alleged incompetence of the Adjudicating/Proper Officer was rejected as an afterthought. Although the final order was communicated beyond the one-month guidance in the CBEC circular, paragraph 14.10 permits exceptional delay with file recording; respondents did not produce the file but the HC found explanations for delay in the order, and dismissed the petition.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:37:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>