<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 298 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780830</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition, quashing and setting aside the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application under the Vera Samadhan Yojna. The court found the petitioner paid five installments timely and attempted to pay the final differential of Rs.34,102, but could not due to technical glitches on the online portal, resulting in a two-day delay. The HC held there was clear intent to comply, condoned the two-day delay, and directed acceptance of the application under the Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:37:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 298 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780830</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition, quashing and setting aside the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application under the Vera Samadhan Yojna. The court found the petitioner paid five installments timely and attempted to pay the final differential of Rs.34,102, but could not due to technical glitches on the online portal, resulting in a two-day delay. The HC held there was clear intent to comply, condoned the two-day delay, and directed acceptance of the application under the Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>