https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780840 The HC held that no further clarification was required on the media-reporting complaint because the publication had taken a general remark out of context, and the media was expected to exercise its own responsibility in fair reporting; the application was therefore disposed of. On the non-bailable warrants, the Court upheld the coercive process, applying the settled principle that such warrants may issue when repeated summons fail and the accused is objectively found to be evading investigation. Repeated non-appearance, the need for physical presence, and the inadequacy of video conferencing in the circumstances justified refusal to cancel the warrants; the petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:37:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780840 The HC held that no further clarification was required on the media-reporting complaint because the publication had taken a general remark out of context, and the media was expected to exercise its own responsibility in fair reporting; the application was therefore disposed of. On the non-bailable warrants, the Court upheld the coercive process, applying the settled principle that such warrants may issue when repeated summons fail and the accused is objectively found to be evading investigation. Repeated non-appearance, the need for physical presence, and the inadequacy of video conferencing in the circumstances justified refusal to cancel the warrants; the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780840