https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780844 CESTAT ALLAHABAD dismissed the revenue's appeal challenging non-payment of anti-dumping duty, holding the Notification imposing duty was set aside by the Tribunal and, in any event, lapsed five years after imposition under s.9A(5) of the Customs Tariff Act. No subsequent notification extending the duty beyond 19.02.2015 was produced, so anti-dumping duty could not be levied on imports declared by the bill of entry dated 13.06.2017. Recovery of anti-dumping duty, interest and penalty was therefore not sustained. en-us Mon, 14 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:37:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780844 CESTAT ALLAHABAD dismissed the revenue's appeal challenging non-payment of anti-dumping duty, holding the Notification imposing duty was set aside by the Tribunal and, in any event, lapsed five years after imposition under s.9A(5) of the Customs Tariff Act. No subsequent notification extending the duty beyond 19.02.2015 was produced, so anti-dumping duty could not be levied on imports declared by the bill of entry dated 13.06.2017. Recovery of anti-dumping duty, interest and penalty was therefore not sustained. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780844