https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47768 Modvat credit was held admissible where goods were sent for job work and the job worker, though exempt under the notification, had actually paid duty on the goods. The Court noted that the same issue had already been decided against the revenue and saw no reason to depart from that view. Rule 57F(4) did not bar credit in these facts, so the assessee was entitled to credit of the duty actually paid and the revenue's challenge failed. en-us Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47768 Modvat credit was held admissible where goods were sent for job work and the job worker, though exempt under the notification, had actually paid duty on the goods. The Court noted that the same issue had already been decided against the revenue and saw no reason to depart from that view. Rule 57F(4) did not bar credit in these facts, so the assessee was entitled to credit of the duty actually paid and the revenue's challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47768