<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 336 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780868</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld validity of reassessment under s.147, finding the AO&#039;s belief based on Investigation Wing material was bona fide and not borrowed satisfaction; reassessment sustained. Addition under s.68 was also upheld: the assessee failed to satisfactorily explain large purchases of shares of a thinly capitalized company, and documentary records alone did not discharge the onus. SEBI and investigation findings of synchronized circular trading and artificial price inflation supported the AO&#039;s conclusion that reported long-term capital gains were a colourable device to convert unaccounted income. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:37:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 336 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780868</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld validity of reassessment under s.147, finding the AO&#039;s belief based on Investigation Wing material was bona fide and not borrowed satisfaction; reassessment sustained. Addition under s.68 was also upheld: the assessee failed to satisfactorily explain large purchases of shares of a thinly capitalized company, and documentary records alone did not discharge the onus. SEBI and investigation findings of synchronized circular trading and artificial price inflation supported the AO&#039;s conclusion that reported long-term capital gains were a colourable device to convert unaccounted income. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>