<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 353 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780885</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a GST demand order was found not fit for interference at the admission stage because the petition was filed after a long delay. The Court also declined to entertain the plea that the impugned order should be quashed for want of notice or hearing in the present proceedings. The challenge to the order was rejected and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:37:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 353 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780885</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a GST demand order was found not fit for interference at the admission stage because the petition was filed after a long delay. The Court also declined to entertain the plea that the impugned order should be quashed for want of notice or hearing in the present proceedings. The challenge to the order was rejected and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>