https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780893 HC declined to interfere with the appellate authority's order imposing penalty and disposed of the writ, granting liberty to the petitioner firm to prefer an appeal under Section 112 before the Appellate Tribunal within the window prescribed by the Tribunal's 24.09.2025 order. The Court directed the firm to deposit 10% of the penalty within eight weeks; on such pre-deposit no coercive action shall be taken until the Appellate Tribunal decides the appeal. Disposal was without expressing any opinion on the merits. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:37:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780893 HC declined to interfere with the appellate authority's order imposing penalty and disposed of the writ, granting liberty to the petitioner firm to prefer an appeal under Section 112 before the Appellate Tribunal within the window prescribed by the Tribunal's 24.09.2025 order. The Court directed the firm to deposit 10% of the penalty within eight weeks; on such pre-deposit no coercive action shall be taken until the Appellate Tribunal decides the appeal. Disposal was without expressing any opinion on the merits. Case-Laws GST Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780893