https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464606 Interim ex parte injunctions in defamation disputes involving public figures may issue where online posts, videos or deepfake content are prima facie false, sensationalised, or capable of causing continuing reputational harm. The Court must balance free speech and reporting against reputation and privacy, but public status does not protect misleading depictions that threaten irreparable injury. Distinguishing legitimate incident reporting from harmful portrayal, the Court treated uncontested material in the public domain as suitable for removal or private conversion, while refusing any blanket protection for contested content at the interim stage. en-us Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Nov 2025 19:04:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464606 Interim ex parte injunctions in defamation disputes involving public figures may issue where online posts, videos or deepfake content are prima facie false, sensationalised, or capable of causing continuing reputational harm. The Court must balance free speech and reporting against reputation and privacy, but public status does not protect misleading depictions that threaten irreparable injury. Distinguishing legitimate incident reporting from harmful portrayal, the Court treated uncontested material in the public domain as suitable for removal or private conversion, while refusing any blanket protection for contested content at the interim stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464606