https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464611 CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order. The Tribunal held payments for flight operations (Apr 2010-Mar 2014) constituted "transport of persons by air" despite contracts or payment by corporate entities, so they could not be recharacterised as supply of tangible goods or other services. The tax demands (Oct 2009-June 2012 and thereafter) and related penalties lacked legal foundation and were unsustainable; the differential tax and penalty were quashed. en-us Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Nov 2025 19:04:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464611 CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order. The Tribunal held payments for flight operations (Apr 2010-Mar 2014) constituted "transport of persons by air" despite contracts or payment by corporate entities, so they could not be recharacterised as supply of tangible goods or other services. The tax demands (Oct 2009-June 2012 and thereafter) and related penalties lacked legal foundation and were unsustainable; the differential tax and penalty were quashed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464611