<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1262 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464612</link>
    <description>CESTAT-Ahmedabad (AT) upheld a departmental demand, holding that provision of ISO tanks by a foreign supplier for storage/transport of the appellant&#039;s aluminium chloride constituted a Business Auxiliary Service under s.65(19)(iv) and was taxable. The bench found Rule 3 (reverse charge) of the POPS Rules, 2012 applicable, not Rule 4, and rejected the appellant&#039;s attempt to classify the service otherwise. Extended-period recovery, interest and penalty under s.78 were sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 19:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1262 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464612</link>
      <description>CESTAT-Ahmedabad (AT) upheld a departmental demand, holding that provision of ISO tanks by a foreign supplier for storage/transport of the appellant&#039;s aluminium chloride constituted a Business Auxiliary Service under s.65(19)(iv) and was taxable. The bench found Rule 3 (reverse charge) of the POPS Rules, 2012 applicable, not Rule 4, and rejected the appellant&#039;s attempt to classify the service otherwise. Extended-period recovery, interest and penalty under s.78 were sustained, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>