https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464617 AT set aside the order cancelling the appellant's CRA registration, finding the cancellation disproportionate to the violations. The Tribunal upheld three inspection findings in full and two partly, but rejected others, granting benefit of doubt on certain procedural lapses and routine record-keeping errors. A conflict-of-interest finding in one matter was sustained. AT held that lesser measures under Intermediaries Regulations were available and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication on penalty (excluding cancellation) after hearing the appellant. The fourth inspection and incidental observations were deemed impermissible to influence the cancellation; parties to bear their own costs. en-us Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Nov 2025 19:04:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464617 AT set aside the order cancelling the appellant's CRA registration, finding the cancellation disproportionate to the violations. The Tribunal upheld three inspection findings in full and two partly, but rejected others, granting benefit of doubt on certain procedural lapses and routine record-keeping errors. A conflict-of-interest finding in one matter was sustained. AT held that lesser measures under Intermediaries Regulations were available and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication on penalty (excluding cancellation) after hearing the appellant. The fourth inspection and incidental observations were deemed impermissible to influence the cancellation; parties to bear their own costs. Case-Laws SEBI Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464617