<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464628</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT allowed the appeal, finding the assessee&#039;s exclusive accounting method consistently excluded VAT/GST payments and refunds from the profit and loss account and that such disclosures were made only in the tax audit report. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) failed to disprove the assessee&#039;s accounting treatment or the materials relied upon, and therefore the adjustment sustained by the CPC was not justified. The impugned addition was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 19:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464628</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT allowed the appeal, finding the assessee&#039;s exclusive accounting method consistently excluded VAT/GST payments and refunds from the profit and loss account and that such disclosures were made only in the tax audit report. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) failed to disprove the assessee&#039;s accounting treatment or the materials relied upon, and therefore the adjustment sustained by the CPC was not justified. The impugned addition was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>