<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 148 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47750</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition, directing the third respondent to release the imported Mulberry Raw Silk as per the CESTAT&#039;s final order. The court underscored the binding nature of Appellate Authority orders, addressing the petitioner&#039;s concerns over demurrage charges due to non-compliance by the third respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 148 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47750</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition, directing the third respondent to release the imported Mulberry Raw Silk as per the CESTAT&#039;s final order. The court underscored the binding nature of Appellate Authority orders, addressing the petitioner&#039;s concerns over demurrage charges due to non-compliance by the third respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>