<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 213 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA  AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47747</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling against the Revenue on all questions of law. The judgment emphasized the importance of meeting legal thresholds for invoking the extended limitation period and the significance of factual foundations in cases involving duty recovery and suppression of facts under the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 22:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 213 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA  AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47747</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling against the Revenue on all questions of law. The judgment emphasized the importance of meeting legal thresholds for invoking the extended limitation period and the significance of factual foundations in cases involving duty recovery and suppression of facts under the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>