https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780795 HC held that seized imported silicone male massagers misdeclared as face rollers cannot be summarily treated as obscene sex toys prohibited under the 1964 Notification, following the reasoning in a recent Bombay HC decision that the Notification's terms must be read ejusdem generis and do not extend to body massagers. The court criticized subjective customs determinations and selective detention, noting identical imports were allowed entry elsewhere. It ordered provisional release of the consignments upon furnishing a bond and payment of applicable customs duty within one week and disposed of the petition. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Nov 2025 08:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780795 HC held that seized imported silicone male massagers misdeclared as face rollers cannot be summarily treated as obscene sex toys prohibited under the 1964 Notification, following the reasoning in a recent Bombay HC decision that the Notification's terms must be read ejusdem generis and do not extend to body massagers. The court criticized subjective customs determinations and selective detention, noting identical imports were allowed entry elsewhere. It ordered provisional release of the consignments upon furnishing a bond and payment of applicable customs duty within one week and disposed of the petition. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 30 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780795