<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 272 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780804</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision denying exemption under s.11(2)/(3) where accumulated funds were not applied to the specified purpose within the permissible period and were diverted to other trusts, breaching s.11(3). Although Form No.10B was filed belatedly, it was on record during assessment and the AO could have verified compliance; the delay was held procedural and substantive conditions were met. The appellate finding was sustained and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 08:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 272 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780804</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision denying exemption under s.11(2)/(3) where accumulated funds were not applied to the specified purpose within the permissible period and were diverted to other trusts, breaching s.11(3). Although Form No.10B was filed belatedly, it was on record during assessment and the AO could have verified compliance; the delay was held procedural and substantive conditions were met. The appellate finding was sustained and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>