<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 274 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780806</link>
    <description>Search assessments under the income-tax law require valid recorded satisfaction for invoking jurisdiction against a person other than the searched person, and the challenge to jurisdiction under section 153C was rejected. The statutory approval safeguard was not treated as a mere formality: approval granted for multiple years without meaningful examination of the draft assessment order and seized material was held mechanical, rendering the assessments invalid. An addition for alleged unaccounted sale consideration based on third-party digital entries and search statements was deleted because the material lacked reliable corroboration and did not establish actual receipt of undisclosed consideration by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 13:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 274 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780806</link>
      <description>Search assessments under the income-tax law require valid recorded satisfaction for invoking jurisdiction against a person other than the searched person, and the challenge to jurisdiction under section 153C was rejected. The statutory approval safeguard was not treated as a mere formality: approval granted for multiple years without meaningful examination of the draft assessment order and seized material was held mechanical, rendering the assessments invalid. An addition for alleged unaccounted sale consideration based on third-party digital entries and search statements was deleted because the material lacked reliable corroboration and did not establish actual receipt of undisclosed consideration by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>