<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 275 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780807</link>
    <description>ITAT RAJKOT held that the AO&#039;s addition of Rs.1,25,000 treated as unexplained investment under s.69 required correction. The tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the AO to tax only the embedded profit of 30%-Rs.37,500-in the hands of the assessee. Since the on-money was paid from the assessee&#039;s own sources, it should not be taxed under s.69 read with s.115BBE; instead the AO must assess it in the assessee&#039;s hands at normal income tax rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 08:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 275 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780807</link>
      <description>ITAT RAJKOT held that the AO&#039;s addition of Rs.1,25,000 treated as unexplained investment under s.69 required correction. The tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the AO to tax only the embedded profit of 30%-Rs.37,500-in the hands of the assessee. Since the on-money was paid from the assessee&#039;s own sources, it should not be taxed under s.69 read with s.115BBE; instead the AO must assess it in the assessee&#039;s hands at normal income tax rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>