<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 281 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780813</link>
    <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT held that payments for composing and DTP work made by a publishing-assesse are contract payments for printing-related services and do not constitute &quot;technical services&quot; under the explanation to s.194J. Accordingly, TDS at the 2% rate under s.194C was correctly deducted, the assessing officer&#039;s demand for short deduction under s.194J was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 08:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 281 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780813</link>
      <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT held that payments for composing and DTP work made by a publishing-assesse are contract payments for printing-related services and do not constitute &quot;technical services&quot; under the explanation to s.194J. Accordingly, TDS at the 2% rate under s.194C was correctly deducted, the assessing officer&#039;s demand for short deduction under s.194J was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>