<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 286 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780818</link>
    <description>SC declined to interfere with the HC order granting interim protection from coercive recovery action, subject to a 20% deposit of the disputed assessed demand within six weeks. Coercive steps are restrained pending final adjudication; the deposit will bear interest and the matter remains subject to the court&#039;s ultimate decision. Appeals filed in 2024 may await final hearing several years due to docket backlog, but interim protection stands as ordered by the HC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 286 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780818</link>
      <description>SC declined to interfere with the HC order granting interim protection from coercive recovery action, subject to a 20% deposit of the disputed assessed demand within six weeks. Coercive steps are restrained pending final adjudication; the deposit will bear interest and the matter remains subject to the court&#039;s ultimate decision. Appeals filed in 2024 may await final hearing several years due to docket backlog, but interim protection stands as ordered by the HC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>