<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 295 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780827</link>
    <description>Calcutta HC held that when an adverse decision is contemplated under s.73(1) CGST Act the Proper Officer is statutorily obliged under s.75(4) to afford a hearing; a show-cause notice uploaded only under an &quot;additional&quot; tab did not constitute proper communication under the WBGST rules. The court found the petitioner had sufficient cause for not replying, granted a final opportunity to file a reply to the show-cause notice, and disposed of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 08:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 295 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780827</link>
      <description>Calcutta HC held that when an adverse decision is contemplated under s.73(1) CGST Act the Proper Officer is statutorily obliged under s.75(4) to afford a hearing; a show-cause notice uploaded only under an &quot;additional&quot; tab did not constitute proper communication under the WBGST rules. The court found the petitioner had sufficient cause for not replying, granted a final opportunity to file a reply to the show-cause notice, and disposed of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>