https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464581 Wilful disobedience and civil contempt arose from repeated breach of a Memorandum of Understanding and successive undertakings recorded before the Court. The respondent acknowledged liability, agreed to pay admitted dues in instalments, issued post-dated cheques, and gave further assurances during contempt proceedings, but defaulted repeatedly and the cheques were dishonoured. The Court treated this conduct as deliberate and contumacious, and rejected the plea that personal liability could not attach merely because the respondent was a director, noting that a director may be proceeded against where contempt is committed with consent, connivance, or attributable neglect. The respondent was held guilty of contempt. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 13:39:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464581 Wilful disobedience and civil contempt arose from repeated breach of a Memorandum of Understanding and successive undertakings recorded before the Court. The respondent acknowledged liability, agreed to pay admitted dues in instalments, issued post-dated cheques, and gave further assurances during contempt proceedings, but defaulted repeatedly and the cheques were dishonoured. The Court treated this conduct as deliberate and contumacious, and rejected the plea that personal liability could not attach merely because the respondent was a director, noting that a director may be proceeded against where contempt is committed with consent, connivance, or attributable neglect. The respondent was held guilty of contempt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464581