https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464585 AT held that the individual registrant misrepresented registration by operating under a partnership firm's name while holding personal IA registration, contrary to Regulation 6. Transactions were carried out through the firm, which collected Rs. 97,92,658 by representing SEBI registration; one complainant's loss of ~Rs. 1.76 lakh was refunded. The Tribunal found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, confirming misconduct for providing investment advisory services in the firm's name without proper firm registration. en-us Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 17:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464585 AT held that the individual registrant misrepresented registration by operating under a partnership firm's name while holding personal IA registration, contrary to Regulation 6. Transactions were carried out through the firm, which collected Rs. 97,92,658 by representing SEBI registration; one complainant's loss of ~Rs. 1.76 lakh was refunded. The Tribunal found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, confirming misconduct for providing investment advisory services in the firm's name without proper firm registration. Case-Laws SEBI Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464585