<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1833 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464589</link>
    <description>HC held that interconnect service charges paid to a non-resident telecom operator do not constitute royalty and are not subject to tax deduction. The court accepted the factual finding that no tax was deductible on such payments, noted Revenue&#039;s revised position for subsequent years in light of tribunal and SC precedent, and answered the issue against Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 13:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1833 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464589</link>
      <description>HC held that interconnect service charges paid to a non-resident telecom operator do not constitute royalty and are not subject to tax deduction. The court accepted the factual finding that no tax was deductible on such payments, noted Revenue&#039;s revised position for subsequent years in light of tribunal and SC precedent, and answered the issue against Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>