https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780779 HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 in a case of alleged fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit, holding such matters generally unsuitable for writ relief due to complex factual inquiries, voluminous evidence and potential burden on the exchequer, with statutory appeal being the appropriate remedy. The court permitted reliance on documents filed with the reply where the impugned order lacked detailed discussion of them. The writ petition was dismissed and disposed of. en-us Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:35:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780779 HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 in a case of alleged fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit, holding such matters generally unsuitable for writ relief due to complex factual inquiries, voluminous evidence and potential burden on the exchequer, with statutory appeal being the appropriate remedy. The court permitted reliance on documents filed with the reply where the impugned order lacked detailed discussion of them. The writ petition was dismissed and disposed of. Case-Laws GST Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780779