https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780780 The suspension was set aside because the admitted chronology showed the alleged misconduct was prima facie unconnected with the period when the writ petitioner was on leave, and the disputed set-off was said to have been claimed later when she was not posted at the concerned office. The complaint arose on 29.05.2023, the petitioner remained on child care leave and medical leave from 01.06.2023 to 22.08.2023, and the later allegations related to December 2023 to March 2024. On that basis, continuance of the suspension was held unjustified. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:35:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780780 The suspension was set aside because the admitted chronology showed the alleged misconduct was prima facie unconnected with the period when the writ petitioner was on leave, and the disputed set-off was said to have been claimed later when she was not posted at the concerned office. The complaint arose on 29.05.2023, the petitioner remained on child care leave and medical leave from 01.06.2023 to 22.08.2023, and the later allegations related to December 2023 to March 2024. On that basis, continuance of the suspension was held unjustified. Case-Laws GST Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780780