https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780721 Where allegations of unauthorized securities trading fall within the special penal scheme under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, prosecution must follow that Act's exclusive cognizance and trial procedure; treating the same facts as cheating or criminal breach of trust under general criminal law was held prima facie impermissible, and detention based on such prosecution was unsustainable. The arrest challenge under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was noted because the record did not clearly show the required satisfaction for arrest, but relief was not founded solely on that ground. Bail was therefore granted because the impugned prosecution could not sustain continued detention. en-us Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:35:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780721 Where allegations of unauthorized securities trading fall within the special penal scheme under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, prosecution must follow that Act's exclusive cognizance and trial procedure; treating the same facts as cheating or criminal breach of trust under general criminal law was held prima facie impermissible, and detention based on such prosecution was unsustainable. The arrest challenge under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was noted because the record did not clearly show the required satisfaction for arrest, but relief was not founded solely on that ground. Bail was therefore granted because the impugned prosecution could not sustain continued detention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780721