<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 191 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780723</link>
    <description>Section 47 CPC can be invoked at the execution stage only on narrow grounds, including a showing that the decree or arbitral award is a nullity or suffers from inherent jurisdictional infirmity; the objection is therefore not barred in principle, but it succeeds only if true voidness is established. On the facts, the contractual documents, correspondence, pricing mechanism and surrounding commercial conduct did not disclose even prima facie fraud, collusion, or breach of fiduciary duty by the judgment debtor&#039;s senior management. The explanation for the pricing and delivery structure was found plausible, and the later criminal complaint and FIR did not by themselves render the award inexecutable. The execution objections were rejected and the award remained enforceable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:35:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 191 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780723</link>
      <description>Section 47 CPC can be invoked at the execution stage only on narrow grounds, including a showing that the decree or arbitral award is a nullity or suffers from inherent jurisdictional infirmity; the objection is therefore not barred in principle, but it succeeds only if true voidness is established. On the facts, the contractual documents, correspondence, pricing mechanism and surrounding commercial conduct did not disclose even prima facie fraud, collusion, or breach of fiduciary duty by the judgment debtor&#039;s senior management. The explanation for the pricing and delivery structure was found plausible, and the later criminal complaint and FIR did not by themselves render the award inexecutable. The execution objections were rejected and the award remained enforceable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>