https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780726 SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the CEGAT's decision that the manufactured goods in question are classifiable under ETI 1905 32 90 and entitled to the reduced excise duty under the applicable exemption notification. The demands confirmed by the Principal Commissioner in 25 show-cause notices were held unsustainable. The SC found no error of law or fact in CEGAT's conclusion and therefore affirmed the tribunal's order in favor of the manufacturer. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:35:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780726 SC dismissed the appeal, upholding the CEGAT's decision that the manufactured goods in question are classifiable under ETI 1905 32 90 and entitled to the reduced excise duty under the applicable exemption notification. The demands confirmed by the Principal Commissioner in 25 show-cause notices were held unsustainable. The SC found no error of law or fact in CEGAT's conclusion and therefore affirmed the tribunal's order in favor of the manufacturer. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780726